American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the AICPA Exam with challenging quizzes and insightful explanations. Master the material with flashcards and multiple choice questions tailored to improve your accounting skills. Ace your exam!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


Does a member in public practice have obligations when it comes to conflicts of interest?

  1. Yes, they should address conflicts transparently.

  2. No, they can choose to ignore them.

  3. Only if they are reported by clients.

  4. Yes, but only when serving clients.

The correct answer is: Yes, they should address conflicts transparently.

A member in public practice indeed has a professional obligation to address conflicts of interest transparently. This is vital because the integrity and trustworthiness of the accounting profession hinge on the ability of members to act in the best interests of their clients while maintaining objectivity and independence. Transparency in handling conflicts of interest supports the ethical principles outlined by the AICPA, which include integrity, objectivity, and professional competence. When a potential conflict arises, it's essential for the accountant to disclose it to the affected parties, thereby ensuring that all stakeholders are aware of the situation. This proactive approach not only upholds ethical standards but also protects the interests of the clients and the public, thereby fostering trust in the profession. The other options present misunderstandings about professional responsibilities. Ignoring conflicts undermines the ethical framework and could lead to significant legal repercussions. Addressing conflicts only upon client reporting fails to recognize the proactive nature of ethical responsibilities in accounting. Similarly, limiting obligations to situations when serving clients neglects the broader professional duty to uphold integrity and make clients aware of any potential conflicts in different contexts.