American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the AICPA Exam with challenging quizzes and insightful explanations. Master the material with flashcards and multiple choice questions tailored to improve your accounting skills. Ace your exam!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


Does accepting a laptop from a vendor as appreciation violate the Integrity and Objectivity Rule for a member in business?

  1. Yes, it always constitutes a violation.

  2. No, it does not violate the rule.

  3. Only if it exceeds a certain value.

  4. Yes, if the acceptance is not disclosed.

The correct answer is: No, it does not violate the rule.

Accepting a laptop from a vendor as appreciation does not automatically violate the Integrity and Objectivity Rule for a member in business. The key aspect of the rule is that professionals must maintain integrity and objectivity in their relationships, which means avoiding situations that could lead to a conflict of interest or influence their decision-making. In this case, the acceptance of the laptop is not inherently problematic unless it creates a situation where the member's impartiality or professional judgment may be compromised. If the acceptance is considered a small token of appreciation and does not influence the member's decisions or professional responsibilities, it would typically be viewed as acceptable. The context of the gift, the nature of the relationship with the vendor, and the expectations surrounding such exchanges play a critical role in determining compliance with the rule. It is important to ensure transparency and proper disclosure, as certain circumstances require it to avoid any perception of impropriety. Thus, while gifts and tokens of appreciation should be approached with caution, accepting a laptop per se does not constitute a violation of the Integrity and Objectivity Rule, provided that the situation is handled appropriately within the context of professional ethics and guidelines.